Hull on Estates
Hull on Estates is a series of podcasts for the Canadian legal community dealing with issues and insights surrounding estate planning in Canada. Hosted by the lawyers of Hull & Hull LLP, the podcasts will touch on some of the key considerations when planning wills and estates
10
752 - Fraud and Fabricated Wills in Probate: Lessons for Estate Practitioners from R. v. Konashewych
This week on Hull on Estates, Doreen So and Kagan Acar discuss R. v. Konashewych, 2026 ONCA 497, in which the Ontario Court of Appeal upheld the fraud convictions of a police officer and an employee of the Office of the Public Guardian and Trustee who produced a fabricated will and pushed it through the probate process to transfer a vulnerable adult's estate to a fraudulent beneficiary. The episode explores how the fabricated will passed through probate on the strength of a third-party affidavit, why the Court held that fabrication could be proven without expert handwriting evidence, and the lessons the case...
751 - Expressed Intentions vs. Testamentary Intentions: Lessons from Bechtel Estate
In this episode of Hull on Estates, Natalia Angelini and Yalda Mostafaie discuss Smith v. Bechtel Estate, in which the Ontario Superior Court of Justice considered whether an unsigned draft will could be validated under section 21.1 of the Succession Law Reform Act. The episode explores the distinction between a deceased's expressed wishes and final testamentary intentions, and the Court's refusal to validate a draft will that had not been reviewed or approved by the deceased before his death.
750 - The Presumption of Resulting Trust & Beneficiary Designations: Kunka Estate v. Giasson
In this, our 750th episode of Hull on Estates, Jonathon Kappy and Sofie Hector discuss Kunka Estate v. Giasson, 2026 ONSC 1842, a recent Ontario decision that provides important guidance on the application of the presumption of resulting trust to registered accounts with beneficiary designations. Join us as we unpack the Court's reasoning and the implications for estate planning and estate litigation practitioners.
749 - Screening for Safety in Mediation: Guidance from the HELP-M Toolkit
This week on Hull on Estates, Nick Esterbauer and Mark Debono discuss the HELP-M Toolkit: Identifying and Responding to Family Violence and Power Imbalances in Mediative Approaches, some of its principles, and its application to mediation in estate litigation context. For more information, please refer to the Hull & Hull LLP blog post on this topic.
748 - Will Challenges Beyond the Two-Year Limitation Period? Insights from Roberts v. Cowie
In this episode of Hull on Estates, Stuart Clark and Mandana Niknejad discuss the Ontario Superior Court's decision in Roberts v. Cowie and the evolving law surrounding limitation periods in will challenges. The discussion explores the distinction between probate proceedings and civil claims, the concepts of declaratory and consequential relief, and how Roberts v. Cowie may create a narrow pathway for certain will challenges to proceed beyond the two-year limitation period while considering the impact of earlier decisions such as Leibel v. Leibel and Wall v. Shaw. Citations for Cases Discussed: Roberts v. Cowie, 2026 ONSC 1412. Leibel v. Leibel, 2014 ONSC 4516. Wall...
747 - Trading the Axe for a Scalpel: The Court of Appeal Overrules Handley Estate in 1086289 Ontario Inc. (Urban Electrical Contractors) v. Welland (City)
This week on Hull and Estates, Doreen So and Li-Mei Mayer discuss the recent court of appeal decision 1086289 Ontario Inc. (Urban Electrical Contractors) v. Welland (City), 2026 ONCA 352, which overhauled the Handley Estate rule governing the disclosure of partial settlement agreements in multi-party litigation. 1086289 Ontario Inc. (Urban Electrical Contractors) v. Welland (City), 2026 ONCA 352
746 - A New Tort, New Claims: The Intersection of Intimate Partner Violence and the SLRA
On this week's episode, Natalia Angelini and Jordyn Sanford examine Ahluwalia v. Ahluwalia and the Supreme Court's recognition of the new tort of intimate partner violence (IPV). The discussion reviews the Court's three-part test and highlights the evidentiary and conceptual challenges associated with proving the third element, coercive control. The principal focus is on the decision's implications for estate litigation, including whether tort claims may be advanced alongside dependant support claims under the Succession Law Reform Act, the types of evidence required, the nature of damages available, and strategic considerations such as sequencing of remedies and the likely application of...
745 - When Does an Apparent Financial Interest in an Estate Give You Standing?
In this episode of Hull on Estates, Jonathon Kappy and Jordan Sarah Head discuss when an apparent financial interest is sufficient to confer standing in estate proceedings, focusing on Will challenges and passings of accounts. They discuss Toronto-Dominion Bank v. Witoszkin, 2024 ONSC 921, to consider whether "moral watchdogs" have any standing in estate litigation.
744 - D.R. v. A.R. - Guardianship of Property and the Consideration of Less Restrictive Alternative
In this episode of Hull on Estates, Nick Esterbauer and Osama Saleemi discuss D.R. v. A.R., 2026 ONSC 796, a recent decision of the Ontario Superior Court of Justice addressing guardianship of property under the Substitute Decisions Act, 1992, and when less restrictive options might be more appropriate. Case reference: D.R. v. A.R., 2026 ONSC 796 (CanLII),
743 - The Rule Against Perpetuities and its Application in Ottawa (City) v. ClubLink Corporation ULC
In this episode of Hull on Estates, Stuart Clark and Filbert Yung discuss the rule against perpetuities as applied in Ottawa (City) v. ClubLink Corporation ULC 2021 ONCA 847 and 2025 ONCA 34. A medieval doctrine and long-standing source of anxiety for lawyers, the rule against perpetuities is brought sharply into focus with these decisions. Stuart and Filbert discuss the complex factual background leading to the litigation, the Court of Appeal's reasoning in both decisions, and key pitfalls lawyers should be mindful of when drafting agreements that impose interests in, or conditions on, land.
